« February 2008 | Main | April 2008 »

March 2008

29 March 2008

Feeling slightly smug of late...

Reading articles like this one...

Families face a £1,300 annual increase in their mortgage payments after the country's biggest building society announced a rise in its lending rates.

Here's why I'm feeling smug...

Four years ago, when we began formulating how much money we could afford to borrow to purchase a house, I calculated how much we could afford to pay, at the time, as a monthly payment even if interest rates went up to 10%.

Based upon that number, that's what we had in mind as the cap to the size of our mortgage.

We also made the unorthodox decision to buy a larger house and share it (live in it) with my wife's parents.

When it came time to apply for the mortgage, we locked into a ten-year fixed rate at 4.89% on the amount of money we thought we could afford to borrow even if we had to pay as high as 10% at some future date.  Which was half the value of the house we purchased with the in-laws.

And more than a few acquaintances thought we were completely nuts on both counts - living with the in-laws and locking into a 10-year fixed rate.

Although it took some adjustment, living with the in-laws has turned out to be one of the best decisions we could have made, especially for our daughter.

And locking into a 10-year fixed rate was another prudent thing to do; and a few people thought we were even nuttier for doing this.

For some of these people, their lifestyle and spending decisions were predicated upon eternal rising house prices and low interest rates with the ability to remortgage cheaply every two years or so.  I imagine this is fairly representative of a large part of the population.  People bought houses on the basis of how much they were allowed to borrow and not on the basis of how much they could actually afford.  And many of them also bought with self-certifying mortgages, so they could stretch the truth a bit about their actual incomes.

Okay, so now house prices are going to take a temporary dip while the market sorts itself out.  But unless something's done about wholesale immigration to the UK or major land use reform, housing prices, at least here in the South East of England, are going to remain rather buoyant.  (If I had known the full extent of immigration to this country, I would have bought back in 1999 or 2000, when I could have afforded it even better, on a contractor's income.)

I have a real problem with the moral hazard being created by the various plans for bailing people out that politicians keep alluding to.  This may sound smug and "uncaring" but I say let the chips fall where they may.

Borrowing money for a house far into the six digits is the most important financial decision any one is going to make in their lives.  There are plenty of free places to find all the information you're ever going to need, to look at it from all angles.

If an increase to the interest rates adds a little over £100 to your monthly mortgage bill, and this is unaffordable, it was you that borrowed too much money.  It's not the fault of the "greedy" banks and mortgage companies, as many of the news stories of late would have you believe.

28 March 2008

Too clever by half...

Just read David "Bloody" Cameron's speech on the economy...

He criticised the Labour Party tax regime without actually saying he would lower taxes.  Oh, he said he would "simplify" Corporation Tax.  Whatever that means.

He managed to say a lot of nothing in that speech, actually.  One was reminded of so many other "third way" speeches by another politician who was not much on substance...

The only reason I will vote Conservative now will be on the merit of the candidates and not because of the party; Cameron is just as useless as Blair and it is really easy to see that there is no other principle at work other than the will to be Prime Minister.

A Fantastic Rant by

Roger Gardner of Radarsite:

...For at least two generations now we Americans have been taking it on the chin from ignorant, self-righteous student activists and disillusioned psuedo-intellectuals brought up on that pervasive academic witches brew of those Marxist-driven, Moscow coordinated sanctimonious and cynically manipulated student protest movements of the 60s. We -- and you -- are now living with the bitter fruits of their destructive labors. Cynicism and disillusionment have become a refined art form throughout Old Europe and the UK, the motley uniform of the latest anti-capitalist, anti-American, antiwar avant-garde...

Read the whole thing...(H/T A Western Heart)

I've had a few debates where I wish I could have displayed anywhere near the amount of erudition and coherence Roger expressed in his rant.

At Long Last, It's Finally Here:

Geert Wilders' notorious Fitna film (H/T to Laban Tall):

27 March 2008

Wa-Hey!

My grade just in for the Entrepreneurial Finance class I took this past quarter...

Another "A"...My GPA is now 3.856...

Four more quarters to go to get my Bachelors Degree in Business Finance...

(Mind you, it would have been easier to finish my Bachelors the first time around, 20 years ago...)

On to "Investments and Portfolio Management" at the end of next week.

25 March 2008

More Solzhenitsyn

In no exact order:

Quoting the head of the Cheka, Martin Latsis from the newspaper Red Terror, in 1918:

"We are not fighting against single individuals.  We are exterminating the bourgeoisie as a class.  It is not necessary during an interrogation to look for evidence proving that the accused opposed the Soviets by word or action.  The first question which you should ask him is what class does he belong to, what is his origin, his education and his profession.  These are the questions which will determine the fate of the accused.  Such is the sense and the essence of the red terror."

And I wonder how far away we are from this:

Continue reading "More Solzhenitsyn" »

24 March 2008

Educashun, Educashun, Educashun

I came across this story originally in the print version of the Evening Standard last week.

Mary Bousted, the leader of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers has been making a few waves with her assertion that schools shouldn't be teaching facts like what happened in 1066, but should take up a skills-based curriculum, just like in Sweden.

I tell you what, if you let us have school vouchers, like they do in Sweden, we'll let you dumb down the kids teach life skills in  state schools.

So, who really won the Cold War?

Particularly here in Great Britain:

How many citizens who were robbed knew that the police didn't even bother to look for the criminals, didn't even set a case in motion, so as not to spoil their record of completed cases - why should they sweat to catch a thief if he would be given only six months, and then be given three months off for good behaviour?  And anyway, it wasn't certain the bandits would even be tried when caught.

Finally, sentences were bound to be reduced, and of course for habitual criminals especially.  Watch out there now, witness in the courtroom!  They will all be back soon, and it'll be a knife in the back for anyone who gave testimony!

Therefore, if you see someone crawling through a window [...] shut your eyes! Walk by!  You didn't see anything!

Three guesses as to who wrote that. 

Peter Hitchens?  No.

Melanie Phillips?  No.

Theodore Dalrymple?  No.

Continue reading "So, who really won the Cold War?" »

My Old Site (For Posterity's Sake)

Blog powered by TypePad